Difference between revisions of "Organ Trafficking"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==An Ethical Dilemma== | ==An Ethical Dilemma== | ||
| − | In December of 2003, an international trade racket was broken up by police in Brazil and South Africa. The ring also involved people in Israel, where the police speculate it all started. The police reported that donors were flown from impoverished neighborhoods in Brazil to Durban, South Africa “where transplant surgery was performed on patients, including some from Israel.” | + | In December of 2003, an international trade racket was broken up by police in Brazil and South Africa. The ring also involved people in Israel, where the police speculate it all started.<ref>Rohter, Larry. 2004. “THE ORGAN TRADE: A Global Black Market; Tracking the Sale of a Kidney on a Path of Poverty and Hope” from the New York Times. Available at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE0DD163EF930A15756C0A9629C8B63&sec=health&scp=1&sq=the%20organ%20trade&st=cse </ref> The police reported that donors were flown from impoverished neighborhoods in Brazil to Durban, South Africa “where transplant surgery was performed on patients, including some from Israel.”<ref>Handwerk 2004:1</ref> Organ recipients may have paid up to $100,000 dollars, but the donors only received a small amount of that money. Still, this was enough to support their families for one or two years. (For more detailed information about this trade ring please see Larry Rohter’s NYTIMES article at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE0DD163EF930A15756C0A9629C8B63&sec=health&scp=1&sq=the%20organ%20trade&st=cse). |
| − | Though this ring was broken up, “such highprofile [success] merely [scratches] at the surface.” | + | Though this ring was broken up, “such highprofile [success] merely [scratches] at the surface.”<ref>Nullis-Kapp, Clare for the World Health Organization 2004:1</ref> Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and movements such as Organs Watch and the Initiative on Global Organ Trafficking devote themselves to researching, combating, and raising awareness about the issue.<ref>See http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/biotech/organswatch/ and http://www.organtrafficking.org/</ref> |
| − | There is still high demand on a limited supply of organs, which has caused many to question whether there should be some compensation to ease the shortage. It does raise certain ethical questions, but “compensation could financially benefit donors while physically benefiting thousands in urgent need of transplants.” | + | There is still high demand on a limited supply of organs, which has caused many to question whether there should be some compensation to ease the shortage. It does raise certain ethical questions, but “compensation could financially benefit donors while physically benefiting thousands in urgent need of transplants.”<ref>Handwerk 2004:2</ref> It could potentially remedy the need for organs and also benefits individuals and families who are not able to support themselves on the lowly pay they receive from their jobs. In addition, if organ trade were to be regulated and legal, it would rid of the exploitive, unsafe, and underground nature of the market.<ref>Handwerk 2004</ref> |
| − | This view is not popular enough among “medical and bioethics circles,” the WHO, the UN, or NGOs right now for anything to come of it. The ultimatum is that organ trafficking exploits everyone involved, and most of all, the poor. There is also a very fine line between selling human organs and selling humans themselves. | + | This view is not popular enough among “medical and bioethics circles,” the WHO, the UN, or NGOs right now for anything to come of it.<ref>Handwerk 2004</ref> The ultimatum is that organ trafficking exploits everyone involved, and most of all, the poor. There is also a very fine line between selling human organs and selling humans themselves.<ref>Rohter 2004</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 11 February 2009
Organ Trafficking: A Booming Black Market
Organ transplantation, starting as an ambiguous and experimental surgical procedure in the 1950s, has developed over the past sixty years and become a widely beneficial treatment carried out in hospitals worldwide.[1] Organ transplantation is the “established treatment for the failure of vital organs such as the kidneys, pancreas, liver, heart or lung,” with kidney transplant being the most common.[2] By 2000, kidney transplants were being conducted in “the U.S., in most European and Asian countries, in several South American and Middle Eastern countries, and in four African nations.”[3]
With the use and spread of technologies, organ transplants are now saving lives throughout the world. Because of this, there is an increasing global demand for organs. Unfortunately, supply has not been able to keep up with this high demand. In the U.S. alone, there are about 80,000 people waiting to receive an organ[4] and yearly, about 10 percent of people waiting for a heart transplant die because there is none available.[5] No countries but Belgium, Austria, and Spain have been able to satisfy the demands of its people.[6]
This shortage of organs is largely due to religious and/or cultural barriers. In many Middle Eastern Islamic countries, religion discourages organ donation from cadavers, “[emphasizing] the need to maintain the integrity of the body at burial.”[7] The same is seen in very orthodox Jewish traditions as well as many Asian countries because of high respect for elders. While there are some traditional and religious people from these backgrounds who have accepted organ donation and sanctioned it “as a gift of life,” many people denounce it and “transplantation from cadaveric sources is rare.”[8] In western countries as well, many people are opposed to letting their dead relatives become organ donors. Throughout the world, people in need of an organ rely mostly on living kin.[9]
