Difference between revisions of "Overview of NGOs"
From NGO Handbook
(→What are NGOs?) |
|||
| (31 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<blockquote>“The 21st Century will be an era of NGOs." | <blockquote>“The 21st Century will be an era of NGOs." | ||
| − | -- Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General | + | -- Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General |
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==What are NGOs?== | ==What are NGOs?== | ||
| − | Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are generally considered to be “non-state, non-profit orientated groups who pursue purposes of public interest”, excluding the private sector (Schmidt and Take 1997). One of the most widely used definitions is given by Operational Directive 14.70 of the World Bank: “private organizations that pursue activities to relieve suffering, promote the interests of the poor, protect the environment, provide basic social services, or undertake community development” (World Bank 2001).<ref>Operational Directive 14.70, August 28, 1989 | + | Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are generally considered to be “non-state, non-profit orientated groups who pursue purposes of public interest”, excluding the private sector (Schmidt and Take 1997). One of the most widely used definitions is given by Operational Directive 14.70 of the World Bank: “private organizations that pursue activities to relieve suffering, promote the interests of the poor, protect the environment, provide basic social services, or undertake community development” (World Bank 2001).<ref>Operational Directive 14.70, August 28, 1989.</ref> According to the World Bank, NGOs are “value-based organizations which depend, in whole or in part, on charitable donations and voluntary service,” and in which “principles of altruism and voluntarism remain key defining characteristics”. More broadly, the term is applicable to any non-profit organization (NPO) that is not established by or controlled by a governmental entity, or even more broadly a nonprofit that is not affiliated with government.<ref>This, however, does not imply that an NGO cannot receive funding from governmental sources.</ref> |
| − | + | There are different ways of categorizing NGOs in broad terms. One categorization is the recognition of a : | |
| + | #''Mutual benefit NGO'', involving an association concerned with improving the situation of its membership, versus a | ||
| + | #''Public benefit NGO'', which is an organization working for the imporvement of conditions of society as a whole or of a segment of society. | ||
| − | Alternative terms used to refer to NGOs include private voluntary organizations (used especially in the United States) and voluntary development organizations (a term favored by many African NGOs). | + | The World Bank differentiates two main categories of NGOs with which it interacts: |
| + | #''Operational NGOs'', the primary purpose of which is the design and implementation of development-related projects. | ||
| + | #''Advocacy NGOs'', the primary purpose of which is to defend or promote a specific cause, and influence the policies and practices of international organizations.<ref> The two categories are not mutually exclusive, as some NGOs engage in both operational and advocacy activities.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operational NGOs are further classified as ''national organizations'', which operate in individual developing countries, ''international organizations'', which are typically headquartered in developed countries and carry out operations in developing countries, and ''community-based organizations'' (CBOs), which serve a specific population in a narrow geographical area. CBOs, also referred to as ''grassroots organizations'' or ''peoples’ organizations'' (PO), differ from other NGOs in both nature and purpose: while national and international organizations are seen as “intermediary” NGOs that are formed to serve others, CBOs are usually “membership” organizations whose purpose is to advance the interests of their members. Examples include women’s groups, credit circles, youth clubs, cooperatives and farmers’ associations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Alternative terms used to refer to NGOs include ''private voluntary organizations'' (used especially in the United States) and ''voluntary development organizations'' (a term favored by many African NGOs). Civil society organization (CSO) is another term used for NGOs, sometimes favored as it does not define the sector in terms of what it is not (non-governmental). | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Note:''' NGOs are not legal entities under international law the way states are. An exception is the International Committee of the Red Cross, which is considered a legal entity under international law because it is based on the Geneva Convention.<ref>See, for instance, http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/genevaconventions.</ref> The ICRC does not classify itself as an NGO, however, because of its legal, governmental status. | ||
| + | <membersonly> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Historical Background of NGOs== | ==Historical Background of NGOs== | ||
| − | While voluntary associations of citizens have existed throughout history, the precursors of present-day international NGOs emerged in the 19th century. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) was founded in the late-1800s | + | While voluntary associations of citizens have existed throughout history, the precursors of present-day international NGOs emerged in the 19th century. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) was founded in the late-1800s and non-state actors became active in areas such as women’s voting rights, international law and disarmament (WWI and Geneva Convention, etc.), as well as abolishing the slave trade. Anti-slave trade groups played an integral role in the abolition of slavery, and religious movements and organizations were also integral to the development of the NGO movement (e.g. Christian missionaries in Africa and subsequently launching aid societies and Islamic groups in the Middle East and charities, etc.). |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The definition of an international NGO (INGO) first appeared in Resolution 288 (X) of ECOSOC, in February 1950, as “any international organization that is not founded by an international treaty.” | + | After World War II, NGOs played an important role in identifying the need for human rights to be included in the UN Charter and, more generally, to develop the UN Human Rights System. For instance, they provided input into the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and influenced the anti-discrimination policies of the United Nations. (Richmond 2005; Alger 2005; Klein 2002; Debiel and Sticht 2005) |
| − | + | ||
| + | The term ''non-governmental organization'' (NGO) came into use with the establishment of the United Nations organization in 1945, with provisions in Article 71 in Chapter X of the United Nations Charter for a consultative role for organizations that are neither governments, nor member states.<ref>Article 71 reads, “The Economic and Social Council may make suitable arrangements for consultation with non-governmental organizations which are concerned with matters within its competence. Such arrangements may be made with international organizations and, where appropriate, with national organizations after consultation with the Member of the United Nations concerned.” The entire text of Chapter X is available at http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapt10.htm.</ref> In 1948, there were 45 NGOs in the consultative status defined in Article 71. Currently there are 2,719 NGOs in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), and approximately 400 NGOs accredited to the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD), a subsidiary body of ECOSOC.<ref>Figures provided by the United Nations. See http://www.un.org/esa/coordination/ngo/faq.htm.</ref> ECOSOC Resolution 1296 (XLIV), adopted in 1968,<ref>Text available at http://habitat.igc.org/ngo-rev/1296.html.</ref> established the criteria and rights associated with consultative status that were to be used for almost four decades, until ECOSOC Resolution 1996/31 was passed in July 1996.<ref>Text available at http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/res/1996/eres1996-31.htm.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The definition of an international NGO (INGO) first appeared in Resolution 288 (X) of ECOSOC, in February 1950, as “any international organization that is not founded by an international treaty.” The importance of NGOs and other “major groups” in sustainable development was acknowledged in Chapter 27<ref>Text available at http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/a21-27.htm. </ref> of Agenda 21<ref>Agenda 21 is a UN program emphasizing sustainable development. The full text of Agenda 21 was revealed at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) held in Rio de Janeiro. </ref>, leading to the revisions contained in ECOSOC Resolution 1996/31. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The last two decades have witnessed a significant increase in the number of NGOs that emphasize humanitarian issues, security and peace, and sustainable development. A prominent example is the World Social Forum, which was conceived as a counter force to the World Economic Forum held annually in Davos, Switzerland. The fifth World Social Forum, held in Brazil in 2005, was attended by representatives of more than 1,000 NGOs.<ref>A collection of articles on the World Social Forum is available at http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/role/wsf.htm.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
According to Debiel and Sticht (2005), there are four key explanations for the increasing number and importance of NGOs: | According to Debiel and Sticht (2005), there are four key explanations for the increasing number and importance of NGOs: | ||
| − | + | # The UN World Conferences of the 1990s (e.g. Rio, Beijing, etc.) offered major incentives for the establishment of new NGOs, and the expansion of existing organizations engaged in development and environmental issues at the international level. | |
| − | + | # The increasing power of mass media and the globalization of electronic communication facilitate the transnational networking activities of non-state actors. | |
| − | + | # International civil society organizations (CSOs) function as substitutes for former state-driven welfare services (health, education and social policy). | |
| − | + | # In many developing countries, NGOs are substitutes for formerly state-run activities in health and education, especially as international programs for economic reforms (e.g. IMF structural programs) forced states to reduce public services. | |
| + | |||
| + | As Fischer (2006) notes, a fifth factor for the expansion of NGO activity appears to be the growing tendency of international and national development agencies to channel development aid through NGOs. Commenting on the exponential rise in NGO activities in both developed and developing countries, a World Bank report remarks that, “From 1970 to 1985 total development aid disbursed by international NGOs increased ten-fold. In 1992 international NGOs channeled over $7.6 billion of aid to developing countries. It is now estimated that over 15 percent of total overseas development aid is channeled through NGOs. While statistics about global numbers of NGOs are notoriously incomplete agree, it is currently estimated that there is somewhere between 6,000 and 30,000 national NGOs in developing countries. CBOs across the developing world number in the hundreds of thousands.” (World Bank 2001) | ||
| − | + | ==Types of NGOs== | |
| + | The NGO Global Network classifies NGOs based on their area of expertise, and lists the following major groups:<ref>The list is available at http://www.ngo.org/links/index.htm.</ref> | ||
| + | * Children & Youth | ||
| + | * Communications | ||
| + | * Conflict Resolution | ||
| + | * Disarmament | ||
| + | * Disaster Relief | ||
| + | * Drug Abuse | ||
| + | * Education | ||
| + | * Environment | ||
| + | * Ethics & Values | ||
| + | * Family | ||
| + | * Health & Nutrition | ||
| + | * Human Resources | ||
| + | * Human Rights | ||
| + | * Law | ||
| + | * Natural Resources & Energy | ||
| + | * Peace & Security | ||
| + | * Religion | ||
| + | * Trade, Finance & Transport | ||
| + | * Population & Human Settlements | ||
| + | * Refugees | ||
| + | * Science & Technology | ||
| + | * Sustainable Development | ||
| + | * Status of Women | ||
| + | * United Nations | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Classification of NGOs== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Below are several classification systems, and the classes/groups under which NGOs fall. | Below are several classification systems, and the classes/groups under which NGOs fall. | ||
| − | United Nations International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) | + | |
| − | ISIC Rev. 3.1 | + | ===United Nations International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)=== |
| + | |||
| + | =====ISIC Rev. 3.1===== | ||
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=17&Lg=1 | http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=17&Lg=1 | ||
NGOs? | NGOs? | ||
| − | ISIC Rev. 4 (Draft) | + | =====ISIC Rev. 4 (Draft)===== |
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcs.asp?Cl=27&Lg=1&Co=9499 | http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcs.asp?Cl=27&Lg=1&Co=9499 | ||
Code 94 – Classes 941, 942 and 949 | Code 94 – Classes 941, 942 and 949 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | This class | + | =====Class: 9499 - Activities of Other Membership Organizations n.e.c.===== |
| − | + | ||
| + | This class includes activities of organizations not directly affiliated to a political party furthering a public cause or issued by means of public education, political influence, fund-raising, etc.: | ||
| + | * Citizens initiative or protest movements | ||
| + | * Environmental and ecological movements | ||
| + | * Organizations supporting community and educational facilities n.e.c. | ||
| + | * Organizations for the protection and betterment of special groups, e.g. ethnic and minority groups | ||
| + | * Associations for patriotic purposes including war veterans' associations, consumer associations, automobile associations, associations for the purpose of social acquaintanceship such as rotary clubs, lodges etc., associations of youth, young persons' associations, student associations, clubs and fraternities etc., associations for the pursuit of a cultural or recreational activity or hobby (other than sports or games, e.g. poetry, literature and book clubs, historical clubs, gardening clubs, film and photo clubs, music and art clubs, craft and collectors' clubs, social clubs, carnival clubs). | ||
| + | |||
| + | This class also includes grant giving activities by membership organizations or others. | ||
This class excludes: | This class excludes: | ||
| − | + | *Activities of professional artistic groups or organizations | |
| − | + | *Activities of sports clubs | |
| − | + | *Activities of professional membership associations. | |
| + | |||
| + | '''Note:''' n.e.c. = not elsewhere classified | ||
| − | + | ===International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations (ICNPO)=== | |
| − | + | The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations (ICNPO) was developed through a collaborative process involving a team of scholars working on the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project (for a fuller description of the project, see Salamon and Anheier, 1996a). The system took shape by beginning with the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) system (United Nations, 1990) and elaborating on it as needed to capture most succinctly the reality of the nonprofit sector in the thirteen different countries that were involved in the first phase of this project (U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Japan, Hungary, Brazil, Ghana, Egypt, India, and Thailand). | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations (ICNPO) was developed through a collaborative process involving | ||
| − | Covered Entities | + | ====Covered Entities==== |
The ICNPO was designed to differentiate entities that share five basic features and therefore | The ICNPO was designed to differentiate entities that share five basic features and therefore | ||
| − | make up the “nonprofit sector” (Salamon and Anheier, 1992; 1996b) | + | make up the “nonprofit sector” (Salamon and Anheier, 1992; 1996b) |
| − | 1. Organized | + | '''1. Organized''' (institutionalized to some extent). What is important is that the organization has some institutional reality to it. In some countries this is signified by a legal charter of incorporation. But, institutional reality can also be demonstrated in other ways where legal incorporation is neither common nor readily available. These include some degree of internal organizational structure, relative persistence of goals, structure and activities, and meaningful organizational boundaries (i.e. some recognized difference between members and nonmembers). What are excluded are purely ad hoc and temporary gatherings of people with no real structure or organizational identity. |
| − | 2. Private | + | '''2. Private''' (institutionally separate from government). Nonprofit organizations are not part of the apparatus of government. They are “nongovernmental” in the sense of being structurally separate from the instrumentalities of government. This does not mean that they may not receive significant government support or even that government officials cannot sit on their boards. What is important from the point of view of this criterion is that the organization has an institutional identity separate from that of the state; that it is not an instrumentality of any unit of government whether national or local, and that it therefore does not exercise governmental authority. |
| − | 3. Self-governing | + | '''3. Self-governing''' (equipped to control their own activities). Some organizations that are private and nongovernmental may nevertheless be so tightly controlled either by governmental agencies or private businesses that they essentially function as parts of these other institutions even though they are structurally separate. To eliminate such situations, we add the further criterion that nonprofit organizations must be self-governing. To meet this criterion, organizations must be in a position to control their own activities to a significant extent. This implies that they must have their own internal governance procedures and enjoy a meaningful degree of autonomy. |
| − | 4. Non-profit-distributing | + | '''4. Non-profit-distributing''' (not returning profits generated to their owners or directors). Nonprofit organizations may accumulate profits in a given year, but the profits must be plowed back into the basic mission of the agency, not distributed to the organizations’ owners, members, founders or governing board. The fundamental question is: how does the organization handle profits? If they are reinvested or otherwise applied to the stated purpose of the organization, the organization would qualify as a nonprofit institution. In this sense, nonprofit organizations are private organizations that do not exist primarily to generate profits, either directly or indirectly, and that are not primarily guided by commercial goals and considerations. This differentiates nonprofit organizations from the other component of the private sector. |
| − | Nonprofit organizations may accumulate profits in a given year, but the profits must be plowed back into the basic mission of the agency, not distributed to the organizations’ owners, members, founders or governing board | ||
| − | 5. Voluntary | + | '''5. Voluntary''' (involving some meaningful degree of voluntary participation). To be included in the nonprofit sector, organizations must embody the concept of voluntarism to a meaningful extent. This involves two different, but related, considerations. First, the organization must engage volunteers in its operations and management, either on its board or through the use of volunteer staff and voluntary contributions. Second, “voluntary” also carries the meaning of “non-compulsory.” Organizations in which membership is required or otherwise stipulated by law would be excluded from the nonprofit sector. Similarly, “voluntary” implies that contributions of time (volunteering) and money (donations) as well as contributions in kind may not be required or enforced by law, or otherwise be openly coerced. |
| − | Basic Structure of the ICNPO | + | =====Basic Structure of the ICNPO===== |
| − | As reflected in Table 1 | + | As reflected in Table 1 (below), the ICNPO system groups the nonprofit sector as defined above into 12 Major Activity Groups, including a catch-all “Not Elsewhere Classified” group. These 12 Major Activity Groups are in turn further subdivided into 24 Subgroups. Each of the Subgroups has in turn been broken into a number of Activities, but the ICNPO system as currently developed does not attempt to achieve standardization at the level of the Activities because of the great diversity of the nonprofit sector in the different locales. |
| − | nonprofit sector as defined above into 12 Major Activity Groups, including a catch-all “Not | ||
| − | Elsewhere Classified” group. These 12 Major Activity Groups are in turn further subdivided into | ||
| − | ICNPO system as currently developed does not attempt to achieve standardization at the level of the | ||
| − | Activities because of the great diversity of the nonprofit sector in the different locales. | ||
| − | Clarifications | + | =====Clarifications===== |
In applying the ICNPO, several types of organizations often prove difficult to classify, and the current Revision (elaborate) is meant to clarify their treatment: | In applying the ICNPO, several types of organizations often prove difficult to classify, and the current Revision (elaborate) is meant to clarify their treatment: | ||
| − | + | Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), are classified according to their major activities. For example, NGOs offering basic health care services in rural areas would be classified in Group 3 400, “other Health Services”; local NGOs providing development assistance by building local infrastructure would be classified in Group 6 100 “Economic, Social, and Community Development;” and organizations providing international humanitarian relief would be grouped in 9 100 “International Activities.” (see Table 1) Following national accounting principles, we would classify NGOs working internationally under Major Group 9 in their home country, and under their principal economic activity in their host country. For example, OXFAM would be classified in 9 100 “International,” in the United Kingdom, but its local operations in Peru would be classified under Group 6 “Development and Housing,” Group 5 “Environment,” Group 4 “Social Services” or some other major group as applicable. | |
| − | Table 1. The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations, Major Groups and Subgroups | + | =====Table 1. The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations, Major Groups and Subgroups===== |
| + | |||
| + | *GROUP 1: CULTURE AND RECREATION | ||
| + | **1 100 Culture and Arts | ||
| + | **1 200 Sports | ||
| + | **1 300 Other Recreation and Social Clubs | ||
| + | *GROUP 2: EDUCATION AND RESEARCH | ||
| + | **2 100 Primary and Secondary Education | ||
| + | **2 200 Higher Education | ||
| + | **2 300 Other Education | ||
| + | **2 400 Research | ||
| + | *GROUP 3: HEALTH | ||
| + | **3 100 Hospitals and Rehabilitation | ||
| + | **3 200 Nursing Homes | ||
| + | **3 300 Mental Health and Crisis Intervention | ||
| + | **3 400 Other Health Services | ||
| + | *GROUP 4: SOCIAL SERVICES | ||
| + | **4 100 Social Services | ||
| + | **4 200 Emergency and Relief | ||
| + | **4 300 Income Support and Maintenance | ||
| + | *GROUP 5: ENVIRONMENT | ||
| + | **5 100 Environment | ||
| + | **5 200 Animal Protection | ||
| + | *GROUP 6: DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING | ||
| + | **6 100 Economic, Social and Community Development | ||
| + | **6 200 Housing | ||
| + | **6 300 Employment and Training | ||
| + | *GROUP 7: LAW, ADVOCACY AND POLITICS | ||
| + | **7 100 Civic and Advocacy Organizations | ||
| + | **7 200 Law and Legal Services | ||
| + | **7 300 Political Organizations | ||
| + | *GROUP 8: PHILANTHROPIC INTERMEDIARIES AND VOLUNTARISM PROMOTION | ||
| + | *GROUP 9: INTERNATIONAL | ||
| + | *GROUP 10: RELIGION | ||
| + | *GROUP 11: BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS, UNIONS | ||
| + | *GROUP 12: NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED (NEC) | ||
| − | + | ===National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities – Core Codes (NTEE – CC): The Industry-Wide Standard for Nonprofit Organizational Classification=== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The National Center for Charitable Statistics is the national clearinghouse of data on the nonprofit sector in the United States. NCCS is a program of the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy (CNP) at the Urban Institute. | The National Center for Charitable Statistics is the national clearinghouse of data on the nonprofit sector in the United States. NCCS is a program of the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy (CNP) at the Urban Institute. | ||
http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/FAQ/index.php?category=73 | http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/FAQ/index.php?category=73 | ||
| − | + | http://foundationcenter.org/ntee/ | |
| − | The Foundation Center and the IRS (and some others) use the NTEE (National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities) | + | The Foundation Center and the IRS (and some others) use the NTEE (National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities). |
Designed by a team of experts, the NTEE-CC includes approximately two-thirds, or about 400, of the 645 categories in the original NTEE. Though the majority of the differences in the NTEE-CC are a result of collapsing lesser-used codes, improvements were also included. With its ease of use and consistent hierarchical logic, the NTEE-CC serves as the best instrument for tax-exempt status determination, NAICS linkage, and nonprofit organizational classification. As of early 2006, approximately 800,000 organizations have been classified using the system. | Designed by a team of experts, the NTEE-CC includes approximately two-thirds, or about 400, of the 645 categories in the original NTEE. Though the majority of the differences in the NTEE-CC are a result of collapsing lesser-used codes, improvements were also included. With its ease of use and consistent hierarchical logic, the NTEE-CC serves as the best instrument for tax-exempt status determination, NAICS linkage, and nonprofit organizational classification. As of early 2006, approximately 800,000 organizations have been classified using the system. | ||
| Line 177: | Line 181: | ||
Major Group | Major Group | ||
| − | I. Arts, Culture, and Humanities - A | + | *I. Arts, Culture, and Humanities - A |
| − | II. Education - B | + | *II. Education - B |
| − | III. Environment and Animals - C, D | + | *III. Environment and Animals - C, D |
| − | IV. Health - E, F, G, H | + | *IV. Health - E, F, G, H |
| − | V. Human Services - I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P | + | *V. Human Services - I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P |
| − | VI. International, Foreign Affairs - Q | + | *VI. International, Foreign Affairs - Q |
| − | VII. Public, Societal Benefit - R, S, T, U, V, W | + | *VII. Public, Societal Benefit - R, S, T, U, V, W |
| − | VIII. Religion Related - X | + | *VIII. Religion Related - X |
| − | IX. Mutual/Membership Benefit - Y | + | *IX. Mutual/Membership Benefit - Y |
| − | X. Unknown, Unclassified - Z | + | *X. Unknown, Unclassified - Z |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| Line 198: | Line 202: | ||
*Kaplan, Ann E. (Ed.). Giving USA, 1997: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 1995. New York: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy, 1997. | *Kaplan, Ann E. (Ed.). Giving USA, 1997: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 1995. New York: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy, 1997. | ||
| − | *Kovacs, Ruth and McLaughlin, Ben (Eds.) Grants Classification System Indexing Manual with Thesaurus. New York: The Foundation Center, 1995. | + | *Kovacs, Ruth and McLaughlin, Ben (Eds.) Grants Classification System Indexing Manual with Thesaurus. New York: The Foundation Center, 1995. |
| + | |||
| + | *Salamon, Lester M. and Helmut K. Anheier. "The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations: ICNPO-Revision 1, 1996." Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 19. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, 1996. | ||
*Sales, Georgia. 1994. A Taxonomy of Human Services, 3d ed. Los Angeles: INFOLINE, Seattle: AIRS. | *Sales, Georgia. 1994. A Taxonomy of Human Services, 3d ed. Los Angeles: INFOLINE, Seattle: AIRS. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 12 February 2009
This article is based on an article prepared by Diana C. Carligeanu for the NGO Handbook, titled "NGO Overview: What are NGOs?.
“The 21st Century will be an era of NGOs."
-- Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General
Contents
- 1 What are NGOs?
- 2 Historical Background of NGOs
- 3 Types of NGOs
- 4 Classification of NGOs
- 5 Notes
- 6 References
What are NGOs?
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are generally considered to be “non-state, non-profit orientated groups who pursue purposes of public interest”, excluding the private sector (Schmidt and Take 1997). One of the most widely used definitions is given by Operational Directive 14.70 of the World Bank: “private organizations that pursue activities to relieve suffering, promote the interests of the poor, protect the environment, provide basic social services, or undertake community development” (World Bank 2001).[1] According to the World Bank, NGOs are “value-based organizations which depend, in whole or in part, on charitable donations and voluntary service,” and in which “principles of altruism and voluntarism remain key defining characteristics”. More broadly, the term is applicable to any non-profit organization (NPO) that is not established by or controlled by a governmental entity, or even more broadly a nonprofit that is not affiliated with government.[2]
There are different ways of categorizing NGOs in broad terms. One categorization is the recognition of a :
- Mutual benefit NGO, involving an association concerned with improving the situation of its membership, versus a
- Public benefit NGO, which is an organization working for the imporvement of conditions of society as a whole or of a segment of society.
The World Bank differentiates two main categories of NGOs with which it interacts:
- Operational NGOs, the primary purpose of which is the design and implementation of development-related projects.
- Advocacy NGOs, the primary purpose of which is to defend or promote a specific cause, and influence the policies and practices of international organizations.[3]
Operational NGOs are further classified as national organizations, which operate in individual developing countries, international organizations, which are typically headquartered in developed countries and carry out operations in developing countries, and community-based organizations (CBOs), which serve a specific population in a narrow geographical area. CBOs, also referred to as grassroots organizations or peoples’ organizations (PO), differ from other NGOs in both nature and purpose: while national and international organizations are seen as “intermediary” NGOs that are formed to serve others, CBOs are usually “membership” organizations whose purpose is to advance the interests of their members. Examples include women’s groups, credit circles, youth clubs, cooperatives and farmers’ associations.
Alternative terms used to refer to NGOs include private voluntary organizations (used especially in the United States) and voluntary development organizations (a term favored by many African NGOs). Civil society organization (CSO) is another term used for NGOs, sometimes favored as it does not define the sector in terms of what it is not (non-governmental).
Note: NGOs are not legal entities under international law the way states are. An exception is the International Committee of the Red Cross, which is considered a legal entity under international law because it is based on the Geneva Convention.[4] The ICRC does not classify itself as an NGO, however, because of its legal, governmental status.
To read the rest of the article, please log in using your WANGO membership username and password (using the log in at the top, right-hand corner of the page). Not a WANGO member, but would like full access to the articles in the NGO Handbook? Join WANGO (http://www.wango.org/join.aspx) as an organization or individual member or purchase a year subscription for $30.
