Difference between revisions of "Philippines NGO Sector"
From NGO Handbook
(→Self-regulation and Tax-Exempt Status of NGOs in the Philippines) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==1947-1991== | ==1947-1991== | ||
| − | The communist movement emerged right after the Philippines gained independence and it was seriously resisted by the “government, religious organizations, and non-communist NGOs.” | + | The communist movement emerged right after the Philippines gained independence and it was seriously resisted by the “government, religious organizations, and non-communist NGOs.”<ref>ADB 2007:2</ref> The Institute for Social Order was started in 1947; at the same time, many NGOs were focusing heavily on farmers, agriculture, and rural development. In the 1950s, NGOs dedicated to welfare were beginning to network and the Council of Welfare Foundations of the Philippines, Inc. (CWAFPI) was created, an organization that later became known as the National Council for Social Development Foundations (NCSD).<ref>Soledad 2006</ref> |
| − | In 1965, the election of President Ferdinand Marcos was problematic for NGOs because he “envisioned a ‘new society’ in which there was little space for civil society and no tolerance for advocacy NGOs. His administration became increasingly associated with the suppression of civil, human, and political rights.” | + | In 1965, the election of President Ferdinand Marcos was problematic for NGOs because he “envisioned a ‘new society’ in which there was little space for civil society and no tolerance for advocacy NGOs. His administration became increasingly associated with the suppression of civil, human, and political rights.”<ref>ADB 2007:2</ref> This caused NGOs to move underground; they had to join the National Democratic Front or become associated with a church or university institution to shelter themselves.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> |
| − | Marcos’ dictatorship became known as the Martial Law Period (1972-1986). Despite being underground, many NGOs were focusing on social development issues and were strengthening and building relationships with poor communities. Although the NGO community was not that large at the time, the action taken by these organizations focused on similar “ideological forces.” | + | Marcos’ dictatorship became known as the Martial Law Period (1972-1986).<ref>Soledad 2006</ref> Despite being underground, many NGOs were focusing on social development issues and were strengthening and building relationships with poor communities. Although the NGO community was not that large at the time, the action taken by these organizations focused on similar “ideological forces.”<ref>Soledad 2006:1</ref> |
| − | This led to the “Philippine Business for Social Progress (PBSP), the Association of Foundations (AF), the National Secretariat for Social Action (NASSA), the National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP), the Ecumenical Center for Development (ECD), the National Association of Training Centers of Cooperatives (NATCCO), and the Philippine Partnership for the Development of Human Resources in Rural Areas (PHILDHRRA) [to be] formed.” | + | This led to the “Philippine Business for Social Progress (PBSP), the Association of Foundations (AF), the National Secretariat for Social Action (NASSA), the National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP), the Ecumenical Center for Development (ECD), the National Association of Training Centers of Cooperatives (NATCCO), and the Philippine Partnership for the Development of Human Resources in Rural Areas (PHILDHRRA) [to be] formed.”<ref>Soledad 2006:1</ref> All of these were NGO networks that united the organizations based on similar community-based programs. |
| − | When Marcos’ regime was overthrown in 1986 (known as the People Power Revolution), CSOs and NGOs began to resurge from underground. | + | When Marcos’ regime was overthrown in 1986 (known as the People Power Revolution), CSOs and NGOs began to resurge from underground.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> During his repressive dictatorship, a lot of international development support came into the Philippines, and when President Corazon Aquino assumed power in 1986 the number of NGOs only increased. In the 1987 Constitution, the government “formally recognized” the roles of NGOs in Filipino society.<ref>Soledad 2006</ref> |
| − | 1992-2000 | + | ==1992-2000== |
| − | From 1992 to 1998, President Fidel Ramos served the Philippines and was highly active in promoting NGO and civil society involvement in politics and public policy. Topics that NGOs addressed, “such as violence against women and the rights of indigenous people” were previously critiqued and labeled “inappropriate for legislation.” Under President Ramos’ term, these issues became common and important subjects debated in legislation. | + | From 1992 to 1998, President Fidel Ramos served the Philippines and was highly active in promoting NGO and civil society involvement in politics and public policy. Topics that NGOs addressed, “such as violence against women and the rights of indigenous people” were previously critiqued and labeled “inappropriate for legislation.”<ref>ADB 2007</ref> Under President Ramos’ term, these issues became common and important subjects debated in legislation.<ref>ADB 2007:3</ref> |
| − | At first, a number of NGOs were supportive of Joseph Estrada (June 30, 1998 to January 20, 2001) as Ramos’ successor. However, he disappointed them and they disagreed with him over issues such as foreign investment and economic governance. Most importantly, a number of NGOs “claimed the Estrada administration did not fulfill its stated agenda to help those in poverty,” and he seemed to give stark attention to NGOs and the coalitions they had previously built with the government. | + | At first, a number of NGOs were supportive of Joseph Estrada (June 30, 1998 to January 20, 2001) as Ramos’ successor. However, he disappointed them and they disagreed with him over issues such as foreign investment and economic governance.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> Most importantly, a number of NGOs “claimed the Estrada administration did not fulfill its stated agenda to help those in poverty,” and he seemed to give stark attention to NGOs and the coalitions they had previously built with the government.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> |
| − | NGOs Today | + | ==NGOs Today== |
| − | In 2001, the current president, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was elected with strong NGO support and her administration is known for continually supporting NGO freedom. However, in 2006, she declared a state of emergency in the Philippines that “raised concerns of a threat of civil liberties.” These concerns were later confirmed “by hundreds of extrajudicial killings” of activists, civil society workers, and people associated with leftist organizations. | + | In 2001, the current president, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was elected with strong NGO support and her administration is known for continually supporting NGO freedom.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> However, in 2006, she declared a state of emergency in the Philippines that “raised concerns of a threat of civil liberties.”<ref>ADB 2007:3</ref> These concerns were later confirmed “by hundreds of extrajudicial killings” of activists, civil society workers, and people associated with leftist organizations.<ref>ADB 2007:3</ref> The President did condemn the killings and called for legislation to address them.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> |
| − | Funding | + | ===Funding=== |
| − | There are very limited estimates as to what amount of money is given to NGOs in the Philippines. In and around 1999, it was suggested that “most NGOs operate on relatively small budgets ($80,000 and below).” | + | There are very limited estimates as to what amount of money is given to NGOs in the Philippines. In and around 1999, it was suggested that “most NGOs operate on relatively small budgets ($80,000 and below).”<ref>ADB 1999:5</ref> However, at the time, some of the larger NGOs could have been receiving up to $1.2 million annually. Grants and international NGOs are the main way that NGOs in the Philippines receive funding.<ref>ADB 1999</ref> Next to foreign organizations, NGOs receive funding inside the country from “government agencies, other Philippine NGOs, multilateral agencies and churches.”<ref>ADB 1999:5</ref> |
| − | Numbers and Types | + | ===Numbers and Types=== |
| − | It is estimated that there are as many as 60,000 registered NGOs in the Philippines today. | + | It is estimated that there are as many as 60,000 registered NGOs in the Philippines today.<ref>Philippine Council for NGO Certification. 2009. http://www.pcnc.com.ph/background.php PCNC: Background and Rationale.; ADB. 1999. A Study of NGOs: Philippines. Available at http://www.adb.org/ngos/docs/ngophilippines.pdf.</ref> This number includes all nonprofit organizations, including about 10,000 that are listed as people’s organizations (POs).<ref>Asian Development Bank (ADB). 1999. “A Study of NGOs: Philippines.” Available at http://www.adb.org/ngos/docs/ngophilippines.pdf</ref> People’s organizations are also referred to as grassroots organizations or community-based organizations (CBOs), and generally serve a specific population in a narrow geographic area. They sometimes are distinguished from other NGOs in while national and international NGOs commonly are formed to serve others (public benefit NGO), the POs are usually membership organizations (mutual benefit NGOs) whose purpose is to advance the interests of their members, such as cooperatives, unions, community associations, credit circles, farmers’ associations, youth clubs, and so forth. |
| − | The number of “development-oriented NGOs” is estimated to be between 3,000 and 5,000. | + | The number of “development-oriented NGOs” is estimated to be between 3,000 and 5,000.<ref>ADB 1999:1</ref> Development type NGOs have made the greatest impact on Filipino society thus far. They “[address] issues of poverty and governance, but also [build up] alternative practices and paradigms of the development vision they advocate.”<ref>ADB 1999:2</ref> Though most NGOs in the Philippines are called development NGOs, they provide a range of services and expertise. A number of them focus on environmental and agrarian issues and are successful in impacting public policy and coming up with programs that involve the community (i.e. anti-pollution campaigns). |
| − | Self-regulation and Tax-Exempt Status of NGOs in the Philippines | + | ==Self-regulation and Tax-Exempt Status of NGOs in the Philippines== |
| − | The rapid increase in the number of NGOs in the Philippines has raised concerns about the ability of the government to regulate the many organizations and to be sure that they are legitimate and use their resources according to their stated goals and objectives. The Philippine Department of Finance (DOF) challenged the NGO community to establish a mechanism to certify the accountability, legitimacy, and transparency of NGOs. It was further stipulated that only those NGOs that are so certified would receive a status as donee institutions with tax breaks for donors to these institutions. | + | The rapid increase in the number of NGOs in the Philippines has raised concerns about the ability of the government to regulate the many organizations and to be sure that they are legitimate and use their resources according to their stated goals and objectives. The Philippine Department of Finance (DOF) challenged the NGO community to establish a mechanism to certify the accountability, legitimacy, and transparency of NGOs. It was further stipulated that only those NGOs that are so certified would receive a status as donee institutions with tax breaks for donors to these institutions.<ref>Philippine Council for NGO Certification. 2009. http://www.pcnc.com.ph/background.php PCNC: Background and Rationale</ref> |
| − | In 1998, the Philippine Council for NGO Certification (PCNC) was thus formed for this purpose. It was organized by six of the nation’s largest national networks of NGOs. A Memorandum of Agreement between the DOF and the PCNC authorized the PCNC to certify NGOs applying for donee institution status based on the NGO meeting certain minimum standards for financial management and accountability. Such a certification was the basis for the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to grant donee institution status. The PCNC also works to promote professionalism, transparency, and accountability among Philippine NGOs. | + | In 1998, the Philippine Council for NGO Certification (PCNC) was thus formed for this purpose. It was organized by six of the nation’s largest national networks of NGOs. A Memorandum of Agreement between the DOF and the PCNC authorized the PCNC to certify NGOs applying for donee institution status based on the NGO meeting certain minimum standards for financial management and accountability. Such a certification was the basis for the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to grant donee institution status. The PCNC also works to promote professionalism, transparency, and accountability among Philippine NGOs.<ref>Philippine Council for NGO Certification. 2009. http://www.pcnc.com.ph/background.php PCNC: Background and Rationale</ref> |
| − | The PCNC is one of the few government recognized NGO certification systems in the world. | + | The PCNC is one of the few government recognized NGO certification systems in the world.<ref>Danilo A. Songco. 2006. http://www.hapinternational.org/pool/files/philippines-evolution-of-ngo-accountability-implications.pdf. The Evolution of NGO Accountability Practices and their Implications on Philippine NGOs: A literature review and options paper for the Philippine Council for NGO Certification</ref> |
| − | As of December of 2008, there were 485 NGOs on the PCNC’s certified list of NGOs | + | As of December of 2008, there were 485 NGOs on the PCNC’s certified list of NGOs,<ref>Philippine Council for NGO Certification. 2009. http://www.pcnc.com.ph/aboutUS.php PCNC: About US</ref> although Songco stated in 2006 that the PCNC has certified 1,000 NGOs in total.<ref>Danilo A. Songco. 2006. http://www.hapinternational.org/pool/files/philippines-evolution-of-ngo-accountability-implications.pdf. The Evolution of NGO Accountability Practices and their Implications on Philippine NGOs: A literature review and options paper for the Philippine Council for NGO Certification</ref> |
| − | Tax-exempt status is given to all entities enumerated under Section 30 of the Philippine Tax Code. This section does not require the NGOs to secure certification from an accrediting body to receive income tax exemption. However, to achieve Donee Institution status, there are some additional qualifications. Donee Institution status allows donations to these institutions to be tax-deductible and/or exempt from donor’s tax. That is, local donors (individuals or corporations) are not only exempt form donor’s tax, but also can deduct the amount they have donated from their taxable income (up to a certain extent). Certification by the PCNC also acts as a “seal of good housekeeping” that prospective donors and funders may consider in their selection of organizations to support. Once an organization has been judged to have met the minimum criteria for certification, the board of the PCNC offers a 3-year or 5-year certification to the organization and informs the Bureau of the Internal Revenue (BIR), which can then issue the organization a Certificate of Registration as Qualified Donor Institution. | + | Tax-exempt status is given to all entities enumerated under Section 30 of the Philippine Tax Code. This section does not require the NGOs to secure certification from an accrediting body to receive income tax exemption. However, to achieve Donee Institution status, there are some additional qualifications. Donee Institution status allows donations to these institutions to be tax-deductible and/or exempt from donor’s tax. That is, local donors (individuals or corporations) are not only exempt form donor’s tax, but also can deduct the amount they have donated from their taxable income (up to a certain extent). Certification by the PCNC also acts as a “seal of good housekeeping” that prospective donors and funders may consider in their selection of organizations to support. Once an organization has been judged to have met the minimum criteria for certification, the board of the PCNC offers a 3-year or 5-year certification to the organization and informs the Bureau of the Internal Revenue (BIR), which can then issue the organization a Certificate of Registration as Qualified Donor Institution.<ref>Philippine Council for NGO Certification. 2009. http://www.pcnc.com.ph/certification.php PCNC: Certification</ref> |
| − | According to Songco, in 1998 there are 6,000 NGOs with Donee Institution Status in the Bureau of Internal Revenue. | + | According to Songco, in 1998 there are 6,000 NGOs with Donee Institution Status in the Bureau of Internal Revenue.<ref>Danilo A. Songco. 2006. http://www.hapinternational.org/pool/files/philippines-evolution-of-ngo-accountability-implications.pdf. The Evolution of NGO Accountability Practices and their Implications on Philippine NGOs: A literature review and options paper for the Philippine Council for NGO Certification</ref> |
| − | Another mechanism for Philippine NGO self-regulation grew out of the Caucus of Development NGO Networks (CODE-NGO). CODE-NGO is the largest coalition of NGOs in the Philippines. It is formed of ten groups of membership associations – one national NGO, seven national networks, and two regional networks – and includes an estimated total of 3,000 NGOs throughout the country. Formed in 1990, the organization was officially registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a non-profit organization in 1991. Also in 1991, CODE-NGO established a Code of Conduct for Development NGOs, the first such coalition to establish a Code of Conduct among NGOs in Asia and one of the first in the global community. This code has been signed by over 1,000 NGOs. | + | Another mechanism for Philippine NGO self-regulation grew out of the Caucus of Development NGO Networks (CODE-NGO). CODE-NGO is the largest coalition of NGOs in the Philippines. It is formed of ten groups of membership associations – one national NGO, seven national networks, and two regional networks – and includes an estimated total of 3,000 NGOs throughout the country. Formed in 1990, the organization was officially registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a non-profit organization in 1991. Also in 1991, CODE-NGO established a Code of Conduct for Development NGOs, the first such coalition to establish a Code of Conduct among NGOs in Asia and one of the first in the global community. This code has been signed by over 1,000 NGOs.<ref>Danilo A. Songco. 2006. http://www.hapinternational.org/pool/files/philippines-evolution-of-ngo-accountability-implications.pdf. The Evolution of NGO Accountability Practices and their Implications on Philippine NGOs: A literature review and options paper for the Philippine Council for NGO Certification</ref> |
| − | + | ==Conclusion== | |
| − | The NGO and civil society sector in the Philippines has come a long way in the past two decades. This is largely due to the generally positive government and presidential support they have received. NGOs have been able to network and create partnerships, campaign for reform, and spur sustainable development. | + | The NGO and civil society sector in the Philippines has come a long way in the past two decades. This is largely due to the generally positive government and presidential support they have received. NGOs have been able to network and create partnerships, campaign for reform, and spur sustainable development.<ref>ADB 2007</ref> In fact, today, the “Philippines is now said to have the most active civil society in Asia.”<ref>Soledad 2006:1</ref> |
== Footnotes == | == Footnotes == | ||
Latest revision as of 11:33, 9 March 2009
Charity and welfare work in the Philippines dates back to the beginning of colonization.[1] The motivation behind Kawanggawa (“charity”) is based on the notion of Pakikipagkapwa, meaning “to holistically interact with others” and Kapwa, meaning “shared inner self.”[2] When charity and volunteer work are carried out, it is implied that there is “an equal status between the provider of assistance and the recipient,” as exemplified by Damayan—the assisting of peers when in crisis—and Pagtutulungan, which means “mutual self-help.”[3]
These conceptions have acted as a backdrop to the successful development of the large number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the country today.
To read the rest of the article, please log in using your WANGO membership username and password (using the log in at the top, right-hand corner of the page). Not a WANGO member, but would like full access to the articles in the NGO Handbook? Join WANGO (http://www.wango.org/join.aspx) as an organization or individual member or purchase a year subscription for $30.
