Difference between revisions of "Classification of NGOs"
From NGO Handbook
(→National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities) |
(→Purpose) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
===Purpose=== | ===Purpose=== | ||
| − | The objectives of the system were summarized by one of its founders | + | The objectives of the system were summarized by one of its founders, Russy D. Sumariwalla, who said that it: |
| − | *Facilitates the collection, tabulation, presentation, and analysis of data by the types of organizations and their activities | + | *Facilitates the collection, tabulation, presentation, and analysis of data by the types of organizations and their activities |
| − | *Promotes uniformity and comparability in the presentation of statistical and other data collected by various public and private agencies | + | *Promotes uniformity and comparability in the presentation of statistical and other data collected by various public and private agencies |
| − | *Provides better quality information as the basis for public policy debate and decision-making for the nonprofit sector and for society at large | + | *Provides better quality information as the basis for public policy debate and decision-making for the nonprofit sector and for society at large (National Center for Charitable Studies). |
===Structure=== | ===Structure=== | ||
| − | As per the request of the IRS, which required a simpler version of the NTEE, the NTEE was revised, and called the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities – Core Codes (NTEE-CC). This includes 400 of the original 645 categories present in the NTEE. The exempt organizations are classified under the NTEE-CC. The code was revised by “collapsing lesser-used | + | As per the request of the IRS, which required a simpler version of the NTEE, the NTEE was revised, and called the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities – Core Codes (NTEE-CC). This includes 400 of the original 645 categories present in the NTEE. The exempt organizations are classified under the NTEE-CC. The code was revised by “collapsing lesser-used codes” (National Center for Charitable Studies). |
The NTEE – CC has ten broad categories: | The NTEE – CC has ten broad categories: | ||
*Arts, Culture, and Humanities | *Arts, Culture, and Humanities | ||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
B114 would designate college and university level fundraising. The code is created using the common code B11 which designates “Monetary Support,” and the decile code B40 which classifies Higher Education Institutions. | B114 would designate college and university level fundraising. The code is created using the common code B11 which designates “Monetary Support,” and the decile code B40 which classifies Higher Education Institutions. | ||
| − | To designate a general hospital one would not need to use the common code. A general hospital would be classified under E22 , where E stands for health, and the decile and centile code 22 represent a general hospital. Therefore, in this case, using only the decile and centile codes would suffice | + | To designate a general hospital one would not need to use the common code. A general hospital would be classified under E22 , where E stands for health, and the decile and centile code 22 represent a general hospital. Therefore, in this case, using only the decile and centile codes would suffice (National Center for Charitable Services). |
| − | + | ==International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations== | |
| − | + | ===History=== | |
The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations was developed by a group of scholars working on the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. This is the classification system recommended in the UN Handbook on Non-Profit Institutions in the System of National Accounts. The system is an elaboration on ISIC. | The International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations was developed by a group of scholars working on the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. This is the classification system recommended in the UN Handbook on Non-Profit Institutions in the System of National Accounts. The system is an elaboration on ISIC. | ||
| − | + | ===Purpose=== | |
| − | The organizations classified by the ICNO share | + | The organizations classified by the ICNO share four basic similarities: |
| − | + | #Organized – The organization needs to be institutionalized, which does not necessarily mean that the organization needs to be recognized legally. However, it does need to have an internal structure, show a sustained pursuit of its goals, and a significant difference between members and non-members. Thus, the ICNO does not consider an unorganized gathering of individuals to be a legitimate organization. | |
| − | + | #Private – The organizations need to be separate from the government. They can receive funding from the government, but need to maintain a structural independence. They cannot exercise governmental power. | |
| − | + | #Self-Governing – Although an organization might be private and non-governmental, it can still be controlled by private institutions and corporations. To address this issue, the ICNO also requires its organizations to be self-governing, Thus, they need to be able to control their own activities. | |
| − | + | #Nonprofit distributing – Organizations are free to generate profits. However, any profit must voluntary – individuals must be free to volunteer. However, a contribution of time or money cannot be required by law. | |
| − | + | ===Structure=== | |
The INCO groups organizations into twelve major activities: | The INCO groups organizations into twelve major activities: | ||
Latest revision as of 09:24, 11 August 2008
Contents
Introduction
There are four general schemes used to classify Non Governmental Organizations. These include:
- United Nations International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)
- General Industrial Classification of Economic Activities (NACE)
- National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE)
- International Classification of Nonprofit Organizations (ICNO)
These are commonly referred to using their acronyms provided above. This article will attempt to provide a comprehensive review of these classification schemes.
To read the rest of the article, please log in using your WANGO membership username and password (using the log in at the top, right-hand corner of the page). Not a WANGO member, but would like full access to the articles in the NGO Handbook? Join WANGO (http://www.wango.org/join.aspx) as an organization or individual member or purchase a year subscription for $30.
